E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Scapegoating Ron Artest is foolish

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:30 AM

Gary Varvel takes note of Ron Artest's contributions to winning a championship with Los Angeles by pointing out the damage he did to the Indiana Pacers. Varvel needs to open his eyes about the flaws of the Pacers organization.

This isn't to minimize Artest's behavior. He lost control of his temper and charged into the stands after a "fan" in Detroit. Now, the "fan" is a notorious thug with a long criminal record, but Artest is a professional athlete and should know better. When you are making as much money as pro basketball players do, there is an expectation to hold yourself to a higher standard of behavior than the general public.

The NBA's laughable overreaction to Artest's behavior exposed that the NBA commissioner David Stern is thoroughly corrupt, but Stern would never have had the chance to sabotage the Pacers had Artest controlled himself. Artest's selfish and ungrateful trade demand the next season also put the Pacers in an untenable position.

However, the Pacers have a lot of problems that cannot be blamed on Artest. First, Artest was not the only one to lose his cool and become violent on that fateful night in Detroit. Second, there have been other incidents over the years.

In October of 2006, Stephen Jackson, Jamaal Tinsley and Marquis Daniels were part of an altercation at an Indianapolis bar where Jackson fired a handgun into the air. Criminal charges came later.

In February of 2007, Tinsley and Daniels had another altercation at the 8 Seconds Saloon, where they assaulted the bar manager.

In September of 2007 Shawne Williams was arrested for operating a vehicle without a drivers license and two traffic citations. The police cited other passengers for marijuana possession and handgun charges.

In December of 2007, someone fired at Tinsley and his entourage with an assault rife, leading to Tinsley's brother acting "gansta" by chasing the culprit. He "fired at the attackers with a 9 millimeter handgun."

In January of 2008, the NBA suspended David Harrison because he failed a marijuana test.

A decade ago, the Portland Trailblazers began to suffer from player misconduct and were mocked as the "Portland Jailblazers" by fans and the media. The Indiana Pacers took up the slack with the thugs and hoodlums on their team. How far the Pacers have fallen from the days of Reggie Miller shocking the Knicks in the playoffs! Mller has to be disgusted by the fall of the franchise that he built.

The Indiana Pacers organization has only itself to blame for its problems. Whatever damage Artest did is insignificant in comparison to all of the other scorn the Pacers have earned.

0 Comments

Comments:


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.