E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Social Services Funding Committee hears proposals

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:30 AM (#)

The Bloomington city council's social services funding committee met last week for a couple hours to hear proposals from the various social service agencies seeking a grant from the Hopkins fund. As is always the case, the proposals for funding came to more than the city had budgeted for grants, so the city will have to deny some of the requests and not fully fund others. This, of course, is why Planned Parenthood should not be funded.

I found it interesting that there we a number of requests to cover salaries. The guidelines for funding state that the funding request should be for a one-time investment, rather than an ongoing expense. According to the document posted on the city's website (download the PDF) "this restriction discourages agencies from relying on these funds from year to year and from using these funds to cover on-going (or operational) costs, particularly those relating to personnel."

This is another reason PP's request should be denied, because this is an ongoing program rather than a true one-time investment. This is not the purchase of an autoclave or a medical examining program (both of which have been purchased for PP by the city in the past) but a request for "help" for a sexual education program that will continue well into the future. Of course, PP does not need "help" for this program, as I have pointed out many times in the past. Planned Parenthood does not need the money. They are seeking a political endorsement, nothing more.

The focus of this program is Indiana University students, though the program is not limited to them. Councilor Andy Ruff asked if there would be a way to determine whether the students who are getting services from this program have a financial need for the program. The woman presenting for Planned Parenthood dodged the question, simply repeating an earlier statement that the program will focus on freshmen at IU.

Obviously, residents of Bloomington should not be paying for students to attend this program when they can easily pay for it themselves, and it is interesting that Planned Parenthood's representative dodged the question. It is easy to give a direct answer to that question, even if that answer is "I don't know and I will have to get back to you on that." Why did PP not answer Ruff's question directly? Sidestepping the question is a disservice to the taxpayers of Bloomington, and shows disrespect for those taxpayers and the city council.

I asked PP's representative after the meeting if this would be limited to college students or whether it would reach younger ages. I was not surprised to find out that it reached into local high schools, but it should be a concern that PP is also reaching into middle schools down to the sixth grade. They will be going into the schools. I sent an e-mail to the MCCSC School Board to ask questions about what PP would actually be doing when they go into the schools.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Sex, love and the freshman 15
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 06:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Scott Tibbs <tibbs1973@yahoo.com>
To: wksmith@mccsc.edu, swanzer@mccsc.edu, mstreet@mccsc.edu, jmuehlin@mccsc.edu, kklein@mccsc.edu, lskelton@mccsc.edu, djbutler@mccsc.edu

Dear School Board members,

Planned Parenthood is requesting a grant from city government for a sex education program that targets Indiana University students. PP's representative told me last Tuesday after her presentation to the social services funding committee that the program will also seek to educate younger students, down to the sixth grade, and that they would be going into the schools to provide this education. I have a few questions about this.

  • Does Planned Parenthood already have times scheduled for this program?
  • Will parents be informed about this, and will parents' permission be required for their children to participate?
  • How detailed will this program be? Specifically, what will be taught to these students?
  • Will Planned Parenthood also be offering STD testing to local middle and high school students?

Thank you for your time.
Scott Tibbs

See previous articles here:

♣  Don't subsidize abortionists -- June 1, 1999

♣  Don't give tax money to abortionists -- May 5, 2002

♣  There is no reason to force taxpayers to subsidize abortionists -- June 18, 2002

♣  City Council gives money to Planned Parenthood -- June 30, 2002

♣  No corporate welfare for the merchants of death -- May 28, 2003

♣  Don't give tax money to Planned Parenthood -- April 30, 2004

♣  Don't give tax money to Planned Parenthood -- May 8, 2004

♣  Sturbaum should recuse himself -- May 23, 2004

♣  Planned Parenthood's grant request represents cynical politics -- June 8, 2004

♣  City Council gives $$ to Planned Parenthood -- June 19, 2004

♣  No corporate welfare for the merchants of death, part VII -- May 10, 2005

♣  City Council gives $1500 to Planned Parenthood -- June 16, 2005

♣  No corporate welfare for the merchants of death, Part VIII -- June 19, 2006

♣  City Council funds Planned Parenthood -- June 22, 2006

♣  Planned Parenthood’s latest request for corporate welfare -- May 1, 2007

♣  Planned Parenthood’s request for corporate welfare -- June 18, 2007

♣  Time to end the city's subsidies to Planned Parenthood -- May 5, 2008

♣  Billion-dollar corporation gets corporate welfare from Bloomington City Council -- June 20, 2008

♣  Monroe County Council funds Planned Parenthood -- December 9, 2009

♣  No corporate welfare for the merchants of death -- April 26, 2010

♣  Follow-up on corporate welfare for Planned Parenthood -- May 5, 2010

♣  Bloomington Democrats subsidize sexual abuse -- June 22, 2010

♣  No corporate welfare for the merchants of death -- September 27, 2010

♣  Monroe County Council funds felonies with tax dollars -- October 20, 2010

♣  No corporate welfare for the merchants of death -- May 10, 2011

♣  No corporate welfare for the merchants of death -- June 15, 2011

♣  Planned Parenthood gets corporate welfare again -- June 17, 2011

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.

  5. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

Thank you for your cooperation.