E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Paul Ryan and medical marijuana

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:20 AM (#)

Paul Ryan surprised a lot of people (and probably caused some heartburn for Mitt Romney) when he said that the states should be allowed to decide on medical marijuana. The Romney campaign quickly clarified Ryan's statement to make the Republican nominee's position clear.

The refreshing thing about Ryan is his honesty. If you ask him what his position is on an issue, he will tell you. The problem is that Ryan is not the nominee, so he will need to be more disciplined in not going off the reservation. The Romney campaign will need to strike a balance so that Ryan continues to be honest but is also disciplined in subordinating his opinions to Romney's when the two differ.

I agree with Ryan, and I would go farther - take the federal government out of it and allow the states to decide whether to allow medical marijuana or even decriminalize it entirely. That said, I dislike this issue for two reasons.

First, it is dishonest. The goal of the medical marijuana movement is clearly full decriminalization of cannabis, but done incrementally. Rather than be honest and push for full decriminalization (or at least make it clear that is the end goal) they're being deceitful and trying to get a foot in the door. I hate these kinds of games.

Second (and more importantly) smoked marijuana is simply bad medicine. Puff for puff, smoked marijuana is more carcinogenic than tobacco smoke. A new study shows that there is a significant ink between marijuana and testicular cancer. There are other legal means of getting the main ingredient in marijuana other than smoking it. Rather than expose people to the negative health effects of marijuana, we should have the main ingredient delivered in a safer way.

It boils down to this: Exploiting sick people for the purpose of advancing a political agenda is wrong. Again, I agree with decriminalizing marijuana. I certainly do not believe that criminalizing marijuana is any of the federal government's business. However, it is simply unethical to use medical marijuana as the proverbial Trojan horse for the purpose of getting full legalization, giving false hope to sick people.

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.

  5. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

Thank you for your cooperation.