E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

A completely backwards orientation on student safety

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

A story in the Herald-Times last week is a perfect example of how far we have fallen as a society and how little regard we have for our responsibilities as private citizens and parents. From the March 20 article, "Schools seek parents' help in keeping children safe online," carefully consider the following quote:

While MCCSC strives to educate its students about using technology safely and responsibly, they can only keep an eye on kids when they're in school. The Monroe County Community School Corp. is asking for parents' help in keeping youngsters safe when they leave school grounds.

"What worries us is that students don't have protection outside our walls," said Jason Taylor, MCCSC's director of e-learning strategies.

The disturbing mentality here is that the government school system is the primary caretaker for these children and teens, and they are taking steps to ensure those children and teens are kept safe when they are away from school. It should be exactly the opposite - parents should be the primary caretaker, ceding care of their offspring to the school for seven hours a day so they can be educated.

There are good people within the government school system who do their best for students, but nothing can replace parents. The primary responsibility for a child's physical needs, safety and, yes, their education resides with the parents - not the state. The concern should be going in the opposite direction - parents should be keeping their children safe at home, and asking about what the schools are doing when they are under the school's authority.

The school should not be seeking parents' help regarding online safety - the parents should be seeking help from the school. But as we have ceded more and more of our lives - and even our children's lives - to the authority of the state, no one bats an eye at the thought of the government school system asking parents to help protect children and teens when they are under the parents' care. It is absolutely absurd.

There is nothing inherently wrong with what MCCSC is doing here - efforts to keep children and teens safe online are admirable. The problem is that our society has degraded to the point where a statement like the one made by Mr. Taylor would not be met with shock, shame and humiliation.

What we need is for parents to take responsibility for their children and for churches and extended families to demand parents take responsibility. Government schools are a temporary and part-time caretaker at best, and government schools are not designed or equipped for child-rearing. That can only be done by strong, intact families.

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.