E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Sacrificing free speech to avoid hurt feelings

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 5:00 AM (#)

My latest editorial at Hoosier Access

The "ban bossy" campaign is absurd on its face, but what is more worrying is the increasing trend to suppress speech in the name of protecting someone's fragile feelings. Are Americans really so willing to take word after word out of our vocabulary because of the alleged harm it does to people and groups? How much are we willing to censor in order to not hurt people's feelings?

Read more at Hoosier Access.


Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.


At March 17, 2014 at 6:46 PM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

So, you'll be the first to condemn so-called Christians who wail about "persecution" every time they're criticized for their hypocrisy? Needless to say, I won't hold my breath.

At March 17, 2014 at 10:42 PM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

You mean like how I criticized the "war on Christmas" hysteria here and here?

At March 20, 2014 at 6:56 PM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

No, I mean like the silly letter you once sent the HT referring to some fool's "mooning" of your so-called "pro-life" picket line as a "hate crime," while you argue now for the "right" of so-called Xians to discriminate at will under the guise of "religious freedom." Why should those who believe "God separated the races" then be held accountable for criminal acts of discrimination under state and federal laws? What's to prevent state-licensed pharmacists from arbitrarily rejecting certain prescriptions? Your obsessive focus on "religious freedom" for one sect only--yours--blinds you to all the harm that creed has done throughout history, and which it perpetuates in the present day. I don't believe you're ignorant of that harm. Rather, I strongly suspect you support it, in the same way your various "happy secession day" letters celebrate the slave-owning Confederacy, while you claim racism is "a sin." You carry double-talk to the ultimate extreme.

At March 20, 2014 at 9:51 PM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

I didn't say it was a hate crime. I said it was a hate incident - which it was, and should have been included in the BHRC's hate incidents report.

I submitted the incident knowing it would not make it into that report, thus exposing the hypocrisy.

In any case, a childish troll exposing himself in public is hardly calling anyone on their hypocrisy.

Post a Comment

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.