E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Take the politicians off welfare

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Bloomington Herald-Times, March 12, 2014

To the Editor:

The Herald-Times' March 5 editorial raises a good point about the inappropriate use of public resources to promote the campaign of an elected official, but that is only a starting point. We should also be concerned about the "informational" mailers sent by our legislative leaders to constituents. The postage and printing of these "informational" mailers are paid for by our tax dollars.

Let's be honest here. These "informational" mailers are little more than taxpayer-funded campaign mailings, representing both an unfair advantage for incumbents over challengers and an improper use of state resources for partisan purposes.

Yes, the mailings may contain valuable information for constituents, and they can help keep us informed about what our government is doing. But is it necessary to include the legislator's name in huge font along with a full-color photograph?

I even got a mailing from my legislator wishing me a "merry Christmas," not even disguised as an "informational" mailing. This would be fine if it was from his campaign account, but using tax money for this is just wrong.

Both Republicans and Democrats are guilty of sending these taxpayer-funded campaign mailings. If politicians will not voluntarily take their campaigns off welfare, voters should demand it.

(3 Comments)

Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.

Comments:

At March 15, 2014 at 5:44 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

You make a good point. I wish you were equally outspoken on corporate welfare--aside from the periodic complaints about funding Planned Parenthood, that is. Ever hear of the Koch brothers? The Walton clan with so many underpaid workers on food stamps? Big Oil? Big Pharma? Big Insurance? Corrupt defense contractors? They seem to own the country under "Citizens United," yet so-called conservatives bow at their altar of Mammon. It would be nice to think you're an exception to that rule, but alas, you "identify with the Republican Party."


At March 15, 2014 at 6:19 PM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

I criticized corporate welfare for big business here and here and here.


At March 15, 2014 at 6:21 PM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

I also was very critical of Donald Trump's use of government as a hired thug, and the abuse of eminent domain in previous posts.


Post a Comment


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.