E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

The United States of SWAT

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

From an excellent article at National Review Online:

Take the case of Kenneth Wright of Stockton, Calif., who was "visited" by a SWAT team from the U.S. Department of Education in June 2011. Agents battered down the door of his home at 6 a.m., dragged him outside in his boxer shorts, and handcuffed him as they put his three children (ages 3, 7, and 11) in a police car for two hours while they searched his home. The raid was allegedly intended to uncover information on Wright's estranged wife, Michelle, who hadn't been living with him and was suspected of college financial-aid fraud.

Read more at National Review Online.

Why does the Department of Education need a SWAT team?

(2 Comments)

Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.

Comments:

At April 22, 2014 at 6:28 PM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

Fund's article makes a good point--as you have in various blogs and letters--but he shares "the Right's" obsession with focusing on sins of the federal government (i.e., the black guy in the White House and his black attorney general). Not until the final paragraph, rushing to finish, does he mention in passing the vast number of state, county and municipal SWAT teams that abuse their exaggerated powers on a daily basis nationwide. It's not solely--or even primarily--a federal problem, beyond the fact that Washington has been militarizing state and local PDs since the days of Saint Reagan, escalating year by year regardless of which party holds the White House. And while we're at it, let's blame "average" Americans who've cheered every law-breaking fictional cop from Dirty Harry to Miami Vice and beyond while they pile up body counts and trample on every right guaranteed under the federal and state constitutions. Many Americans accept this as the norm and don't complain unless their personal interests are somehow affected. Otherwise, it's just entertainment, and it it bleeds, it leads.


At April 22, 2014 at 6:48 PM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

And while we're at it, let's blame "average" Americans who've cheered every law-breaking fictional cop from Dirty Harry to Miami Vice

##############
##############

That's a good point.

I maintain that the first slasher film wasn't "Halloween" in 1978 - it was "Death Wish" in 1974. There really is no difference between Paul Kersey of the DW series and Jason Voorhees of the "Friday the 13th" series. Both were wronged and are taking revenge on the people they hold responsible.


Post a Comment


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.