E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Friday, May 16, 2014

Fighting rape on college campuses

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

All of the talk about protecting women on college campuses raises some very disturbing and frightening questions and presents a clear and present danger to our Constitution. Obviously, rapists need to be harshly punished and the innocent need to be protected, but why are college campuses dealing with this at all?

See articles on this issue here and here and here and here and here.

The idea that university administrators should be the ones dealing with rape on campus is absolutely absurd. Rape is a violent crime, and the place for violent crime to be prosecuted is in the criminal justice system - not a university judicial system. The worst thing a university can do to a rapist (even after shockingly violent rapes) is to expel someone from campus. Well, whoop de diddly do. We often hear about criminals getting a slap on the wrist, but a slap on the wrist would be more serious than expulsion. Criminals need jail time, not academic discipline.

It may be true that if all of the rape cases that happen on campus were prosecuted in the criminal justice system, it would place a strain on the system. The solution to that is easy. Simply take all of the money spent on prosecuting nonviolent crimes via the War on Drugs and move that money into prosecuting violent crime instead. Someone smoking dope in his home might be a fool, but he is not a threat to anyone else. Rapists are a real threat.

The clear and present danger to our Constitution comes from the Obama regime's determination that universities establish a clearly illegal "preponderance of the evidence" standard in prosecuting students accused of sexual assault. In some cases, the accused is not allowed to even confront his accuser in the campus "judicial" proceeding, much less have access to an attorney as demanded by the Constitution.

That is such a shocking violation of due process rights that I am stunned that there is not more public outrage about the Obama regime's betrayal of our constitutional protections. This alone is grounds for impeachment. One need only look at how the faculty and administration at Duke so-called "University" rushed to form a lynch mob when the lacrosse team was falsely accused of "rape" to see how dangerous this is.

We need to take rape seriously, and many universities sadly do not. This leaves victims hanging and creates an opportunity for rapists to attack more women. The solution is certainly not to throw the Constitution and due process rights into the garbage can as the Obama regime proposes.

The solution is to place prosecution of rape back where it belongs - in the criminal justice system. The role of universities should be only to provide support for victims, and keep the alleged victim and accused separated, if need be. Let police and prosecutors handle crime. University discipline should be reserved for things like plagiarism.

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.

  5. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

Thank you for your cooperation.


At May 17, 2014 at 8:02 AM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

Here is a comment on this article on the Facebook page.