E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Friday, May 9, 2014

Time to end corporate welfare for Planned Parenthood

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

The following is an open letter to the Bloomington City Council.

----Original Message Follows----
From: Scott Tibbs [mailto:tibbs1973@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 6:59 PM
To: mayert@bloomington.in.gov; ruffa@bloomington.in.gov; sandbers@bloomington.in.gov; sturbauc@bloomington.in.gov; grangerd@bloomington.in.gov; spechlem@bloomington.in.gov; rollod@bloomington.in.gov; neherd@bloomington.in.gov; volans@bloomington.in.gov
Subject: Time to end corporate welfare for Planned Parenthood

Councilors,

Once again, Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky is asking you for a grant from the Jack Hopkins social services funding program, and once again I am imploring you to reject their application for corporate welfare. This annual farce needs to end, and this is the year to end it.

The Hopkins program is supposed to be a "one time" investment for a specific project or program, but since PPINK has come to you year after year asking you to give them other people's money, the idea that this is a "one time" situation is a laughable farce. PPINK even admits on Page 2 of its application that this is for operational funds. It is one thing to force us to subsidize true one time investments (though office furniture and computers hardly represent a pressing social service program) but forcing us to subsidize PPINK's operating budget is a bridge too far.

In the most recent fiscal report on its website, PPINK reports taking in $14,397,299 and spending $14,343,147. The budget surplus is not as huge as it has been in past years (making your repeated handouts to them even more absurd) but given how wealthy PPINK has been historically, it is not fiscally prudent to give them yet another handout.

Simply put, Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky does not need another handout from city government. There is more than enough money floating around between the national organization and all affiliates that the limited funding in the Hopkins program can go to deserving organizations.

Of course, the most offensive part about being forced to fund Planned Parenthood for thousands of your constituents is not that PPINK does not need the money, but that PPINK performs abortions at its South Walnut facility every Thursday. It is wholly inappropriate for city government to force taxpayers to subsidize an organization that performs an act we find morally abominable, regardless of whether the money goes to "abortion services."

It is time to stop disrespecting your constituents - to say nothing of the truly needy organizations who are denied funding - by abusing the Hopkins social services fund to issue a political endorsement for pro-abortion politics. Please deny PPINK's funding request, and use the money entrusted to you by taxpayers in a more fiscally responsible and less morally abhorrent manner.

(7 Comments)

Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.

Comments:

At May 10, 2014 at 9:00 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

"Time to end corporate welfare for Planned Parenthood."

But not for the Koch brothers, Big Oil, corrupt defense contractors, or any other corporate parasites? It's sad that religious obsession blinds you to the worst corrupting influences in America, rapists of the economy and the environment. Your party worships at the altar of Mammon while blithely ignoring the orders your alleged savior left for dealing with the poor. "Christian conservatives" rank among the most egregious of all modern hypocrites.


At May 10, 2014 at 9:18 AM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

When have I ever supported any corporate welfare? I have opposed corporate welfare for pro sports on many occasions.


At May 10, 2014 at 9:46 AM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

In any case, the Bloomington City Council does not give money to the Koch Brothers or Big Oil.


At May 10, 2014 at 3:08 PM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

"I have opposed corporate welfare for pro sports on many occasions."

I must have missed those. Still, hardly the most egregious offenders.

"In any case, the Bloomington City Council does not give money to the Koch Brothers or Big Oil."

From prior readings of your blog, I hadn't realized your geographical focus was so narrow...or, dare I say, parochial? Nonetheless, I stand by my judgment of "conservative Xians," re. their widespread worship of wealth and disdain for the poor. The very opposite of Christlike behavior and, no doubt, a one-way ticket to Hell, if that mythical place existed.


At May 10, 2014 at 8:15 PM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

Here is one example. Here is another.

But ultimately, your argument is a red herring logical fallacy. Instead of directly addressing why a billion-dollar industry is deserving of a slice of the very limited pie doled out to social service agencies annually, you point to this or that or the other thing.

I'm not interested in playing that game.


At May 12, 2014 at 9:19 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

Nor, obviously, in addressing the rank hypocrisy of your party or your religion. That's gotta sting.


At May 12, 2014 at 6:03 PM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

The "rank hypocrisy" exists only in your imagination. Show me where I have supported any kind of corporate welfare, and you can talk about hypocrisy. Until then, you have nothing but your fantasies.


Post a Comment


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.