E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Pathetic and dangerous excuses by Obama apologists

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

A recent discussion about the Bowe Bergdahl situation on HeraldTimesOnline.com brought forth some typically childish "arguments" as well as one very dangerous argument. First, let me summarize the childish argument:

Waah! Waah! Waah! Waah!

Bush did it toooooooooooooooooooo!!!!

Waah! Waah! Waah! Waah!

Seriously? This is what Leftists are reduced to arguing?

Look. I do not care what George W. Bush did or did not do. Bush has not been President for over five years now. It is time for Obama and his apologists to grow up and stop whining about Bush every time Obama faces legitimate criticism for his policies. Bush was far from a perfect President and deserves a lot of criticism, but that has absolutely nothing to do with Barack Obama's policies and whether they are good or bad.

Some Leftists have even whined about Ronald Reagan, who has been out of office for 25 years. That is really pathetic.

To use one of Obama's favorite phrases, let me be clear: Barack Obama is the President. George W. Bush is not President. Ronald Reagan is not President. John McCain is not President and never will be. Mitt Romney is not President and never will be. The decisions made by Barack Obama belong to him and him alone, not anyone else. It is long past time for Obama apologists to own his policies.

Now for the dangerous argument:

Now shut up and go away because unless you've served, you have no place to be discussing what is and isn't too high a price to pay for one of ours.

This extreme glorification of military service reminds me of the 1998 movie Starship Troopers, where the only people who are full citizens are people who have served in the military. I think some folks do not realize that Starship Troopers is supposed to be a parody, not a serious movie.

The framers of the Constitution set the military under civilian command for a reason. While those who bravely fight the nation's enemies are honored, the idea that only the military itself is qualified to comment on military policy, war policy, national defense or related matters is antithetical to the concept of civilian rule of the military and is a ruse to silence the free speech of those who oppose whatever administration is in power. And yes, Republicans have done this too.

Of course, it is also an ad hominem logical fallacy. The validity of an argument does not hinge on the characteristics of the person making the argument. An argument is either logically sound or unsound, regardless of who is making the argument. This is basic logic, and not difficult to grasp when one is thinking instead of feeling.

Whatever one thinks of the Bergdahl trade, these fallacious arguments should be rejected.

(4 Comments)

Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.

Comments:

At June 10, 2014 at 5:45 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

"Look. I do not care what George W. Bush did or did not do. Bush has not been President for over five years now."

And tiny "conservative" brains seem incapable of recognizing that the hideous mess he left behind may be impossible to fix as long as obstructionist parasites in Congress keep their pledge to block any move made by this president--including measures originally authored and promoted by Republicans. How stupid are these people, really?


At June 10, 2014 at 6:38 AM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

Thanks for proving me right with your comment.

"The hideous mess he left behind" has absolutely nothing to do with Obama's policies. Bush is not responsible for Obama's policies. Obama and Obama alone is responsible for Obama's policies.

Whether Obama's policies are either good or bad has nothing whatsoever to do with George W. Bush.

Barack Obama is the President, and Obama alone is responsible for his decisions.


At June 12, 2014 at 5:26 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

"Whether Obama's policies are either good or bad has nothing whatsoever to do with George W. Bush."

You take dubious honors for the day's most absurd comment. It is the GOP's ridiculous--and yes, clearly racist--insistence on blaming the black guy in the White House for everything that happens in America, from rising gas prices to the deranged claim by gun nuts that leftists "fabricated" the Sandy Hook massacre--which invalidates your thesis. No doubt, you'd prefer it if Obama knuckled under to Republicans, panned affordable health care, and accepted the ridiculous Ryan budget (failed Reaganomics with a new name and smirking face)--then you could blame him when GOP policies fail once again, as they have under every Republican president since Harding. Life must be nice in the bubble, where history has no consequences and delusions morph into "facts" via Faux News.


At June 12, 2014 at 5:43 AM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

It is your comment that is absurd.

I am blaming Obama for Obama's policies. The Bergdahl trade was an Obama policy, so Obama alone is responsible for it. Obama is the President and he has been President for five years

This was his decision. That has nothing to do with George W. Bush or anyone else.

It is childish to the extreme to whine about Republicans rather than deal with criticisms of Obama's policies.


Post a Comment


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.