E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Friday, June 6, 2014

Protecting the basic human rights of prisoners

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

I was dismayed when I learned that Indiana would not be complying with federal guidelines to fight against prison rape, which came about as part of a long process after the Prison Rape Elimination Act passed both houses of Congress without objection in 2003. Indiana's governor was a member of the House of Representatives at the time.

To be fair, not following the federal guidelines does not mean that Indiana will be doing nothing to prevent prisoners from being raped. The Indianapolis Star reports that the state Department of Corrections "already has put many rape prevention measures in place on its own," including a position in each prison to make it easier to report violations. The federal government should not be automatically assumed to be the ultimate authority on this matter, and if states can be as effective in protecting basic human rights without spending as much money, that is commendable.

But protecting basic human rights is one of the most basic responsibilities of state government, or government at any level. If we are going to hold people in prison (and we must do so to protect the innocent from violent criminals) then we have a responsibility to protect them from predators while they are in our custody. Jesus warns us in Matthew 25:31-46 that if we do not protect "the least of these" (specifically mentioning prisoners) that we are in danger of damnation.

In fact, I cannot think of anything state government does that is more important than protecting the human rights of prisoners in our custody. There are other things that state government does that may be as important - putting criminals in prison in the first place, for example - but none of them are more important than making sure that our prisoners are not subject to sexual violence. We must not shirk this critical duty.


♣ - The human rights crisis in American prisons -- July 20, 2009

♣ - The human rights crisis in American prisons -- March 17, 2011

♣ - We must put a stop to sexual abuse of prisoners -- May 29, 2012

♣ - Opposing the evil of prison rape -- June 8, 2012

♣ - Rape is not a joke. It is a crime. -- July 2, 2012

♣ - The human rights crisis in American prisons -- March 7, 2014

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.