E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Friday, July 4, 2014

Looking back on Benjamin Smith and free speech

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Fifteen years ago today, "white nationalist" terrorist Benjamin Smith went on a shooting rampage, murdering two people out of a deranged hatred for their skin pigmentation. Later that day, Smith died and went to Hell after a chase with police. Fifteen years after his acts of pure evil, it is worth revisiting the issue of free speech, brought to the forefront by Smith's distribution of racist literature and the disturbing attacks on his First Amendment rights.

Following are four editorials I wrote in 1998 and 1999 about this issue:

In the days after the rampage, I considered removing the two articles I had written defending Smith's free speech rights from my website. I ultimately did not, and that was the right decision. It is here where our commitment to free speech is truly tested - speech that is almost universally despised. If one racist is forced to shut up by government or by a state institution, no one else is going to be harmed and we do not have to listen to his nonsense any more.

But if we believe in free speech, we need to defend all speech from state censorship - even the speech we find most objectionable. We need to do so not only because the principle is important, but because the precedent set by allowing censorship is dangerous. Once the precedent is established that the state or a state institution can engage in censorship, all speech is in danger. The answer to hate speech is always more speech.

(7 Comments)

Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.

Comments:

At July 4, 2014 at 5:44 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

"Later that day, Smith died and went to Hell after a chase with police."

I know you dote on this sadistic image, but as you once admitted in an email exchange, not one word of Scripture supports it. In fact, your Bible says the direct opposite, quite clearly saying that the dead know nothing, have no reward (or by extension, punishment), and that judgment and punishment of sinners awaits JC's second coming. As an alleged "Bible-believing Xian," how do you reconcile this heretical fairy tale cooked up by priests 1600 years after the supposed resurrection? If the Bible is "true," you're so far out in left field on this one that you literally deny scriptural truth. It's totally bizarre.


At July 6, 2014 at 9:34 AM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

No, I did not say that.


At July 8, 2014 at 5:31 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

So, you don't recall our email exchange on this very question, wherein you declared your adherence to the so-called "Westminster Confession of Faith," drawn up in 1646 by power-hungry church leaders? Wish I'd saved the email, but alas, I didn't think you'd try to weasel out of it down the road. Since that's your ploy, however, kindly tell your readers where in Scripture you find any text supporting the flight of souls to Heaven or Hell at the moment of death. Inquiring minds want to know!


At July 8, 2014 at 6:55 AM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

I did not say that there was no text in Scripture to support my position, though I have said I subscribe to the WCF.

As far as Scriptural evidence for souls going immediately to Hell: Jesus talks about it, recounting the rich man and Lazarus in Luke 16:19-31.

The proof texts are here:

http://www.reformed.org/documents/wcf_with_proofs/index.html?body=/documents/wcf_with_proofs/ch_XXXII.html


At July 8, 2014 at 3:05 PM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

One more classic example of "inerrant" scripture's countless fatal contradictions. I call your single text and raise you the following: Psalm 37:20; Malachi 4:1,3; Isaiah 1:28; Obadiah 1:16; Nahum 1:9; Matthew 13:39-40; Luke 16:19-31; 2 Peter 2:9; Revelation 20:12-15. For a detailed explanation of why you're dead wrong, see http://www.bibleinfo.com/en/topics/hell. You'll never admit it of course, and we both know why: in popular parlance, the heretical image of souls writhing in eternal agony "floats your boat" big-time. BTW, since my verses all flatly contradict yours, it's worth remembering the words of D.L. Moody, so-called "father" of Xian fundamentalism: "If one part of scripture were untrue, the whole of it went for nothing." Can I get an "Amen"?


At July 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

None of the verses you provided contradict the doctrine that souls are judged upon death. Earthly judgment and eternal judgment are not mutually exclusive.

The verse from Revelation you cited explicitly says souls that were in Hell before the final judgment (as well as Hell itself) are cast into the Lake of Fire.

BTW, the link I provided to the WCF has a number of Bible verses as proof texts for the statement that people go directly to their final judgment when they die.

Annihilationism is popular for a reason: No one wants to believe in it. It’s a horrifying reality to think of unsaved loved ones suffering eternal damnation. But popularity doesn't make it true.


At July 8, 2014 at 6:19 PM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

"Annihilationism is popular for a reason."

And that would be the fact that multiple verses of "inerrant" scripture specifically say that "sinners" will be completely consumed by fire, not lingering forever in a pit somewhere for a sadist's personal amusement. How, exactly, are they suffering eternally, thereby exciting you, it "the dead know not any thing"? Your book of ancient fairy tales collapses on itself--and, of course, "proves" nothing whatsoever. They call it "blind faith" for a reason, as in "blind, deaf, and dumb."


Post a Comment


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.