E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Monday, July 14, 2014

Since when is child abuse a legitimate law enforcement tool?

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

"Sexting" among teens is a legitimate problem, and we need to take it seriously. Teens sending sexually explicit pictures or videos to each other via their smartphones is something we as a society should work to fight against, because of how it contributes to the moral degradation of our youth and is a doorway to early sexual activity.

With that established, how does it make sense for law enforcement to forcibly take pornographic pictures of teenage boys? How does it make sense for a so-called "judge" to agree to such an invasive and extreme search warrant - a search warrant that if executed is probably a criminal act in and of itself? While law enforcement ultimately decided not to execute the search warrant, this still raises extremely troubling questions about out-of-control government.

Simply submitting the teen's smartphone as evidence should be enough to prosecute him. But should he be prosecuted for child pornography at all? The common sense answer is no. Prosecuting a teenager for child pornography for taking explicit pictures of himself trivializes child pornography and the evil and horrific abuse the victims endure. There should be some sort of legal sanction for teens who engage in this behavior but this charge is simply overkill.

What is more of a concern is that parents are not training their children and teens in the appropriate use of technology. Many parents are ignorant of the pervasiveness of this kind of behavior, and do not think about the ramifications of giving an internet-enabled mobile computer to a teenager. More parental supervision of teens' use of internet-enabled mobile devices and training those teens in moral standards is what is needed.

Ideally, this should have been handled by the parents before it got to law enforcement to be prosecuted as a crime. The primary deterrent for a teenager considering taking and sending inappropriate media should be how his parents (and his girlfriend's parents) are going to react to his behavior. Melting or smashing their smartphones in front of them (along with other punishments) would be more appropriate than a criminal prosecution.


Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.


At July 14, 2014 at 5:41 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

Police at all levels, worldwide, commit more crimes than they solve every day. Sadly, they always have and always will.

Post a Comment

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.