E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Monday, September 29, 2014

25% does not equal 0.11%

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 5:30 PM (#)

According to the Indiana Daily Student, "There were 22 sexual assaults reported on the (IU) campus in 2013." Assuming an enrollment of about 40,000 students, and assuming half of those students are women, that comes out to 0.11% of women on campus assaulted. So here's the question. The feminist line is 1 of 4 women in college are assaulted. Something does not add up, because 0.11% does not equal 25%.

On a related note, here is an article from Time.com arguing the "yes means yes" standard will "create a disturbing precedent for government regulation of consensual sex."

(2 Comments)

Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.

Comments:

At October 2, 2014 at 8:24 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

There are two obvious and well-known answers to your slanted question, neither having anything at all to do with feminism. First, every U.S. law enforcement agency and all reputable civilian experts on sex crimes agree that sexual assaults are vastly under-reported by victims, with 10% or less logged by authorities and fewer still prosecuted. The other answer, also obvious, is that most sexual assaults will not occur on campus, or necessarily during college-age years. Sexual abuse of females, as of males, often begins in early childhood. They're still victims, they still grow up to be women--and yes, they still count toward the total.


At October 2, 2014 at 5:53 PM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

No, the childhood victims are not included in the 1 in 4. Nor are women who have graduated from college. The inflated estimate is that one in four women are assaulted in college.

The disparity between 25% and 0.11% is too huge to just brush off.

Sure, many assaults are not reported, but the disparity here makes it obvious that the estimate is greatly inflated. Even taking the 10% reported at face value, this is not even 10%. If one in four women are assaulted, then only 1 of every 227 assaults were reported that year. Sorry, but I am just not buying it.

Also, are we to really believe that students at universities are much more vulnerable than women in crime-ridden ghettos? Come on, now. It's inflated for dramatic effect.


Post a Comment


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.