E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Thursday, October 2, 2014

Pseudonyms for letters to the editor? Absolutely not!

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

For much of the internet, online comments are a virtual sewer. This is because when people can comment anonymously, they will say things they would never dare say if their real name and reputation were attached to their comments. We see this in action at the local newspaper, the Herald-Times.

Letters to the editor, which require a real name to be attached to the article, are generally much more civil than anonymous comments for stories - and this is despite the fact that the comments are moderated. The use of real names is important to the civility of discourse. The quality of comments and the civility of discussion on HeraldTimesOnline would be greatly improved if the fake names were abolished.

Losing the "three strikes" rule that HeraldTimesOnline implemented in 2012 by adopting the vastly inferior TownNews.com template in 2013 has hurt civil discourse badly. The "three strikes" rule was incredibly valuable in keeping the trolls contained, because they knew they would be gagged for two weeks if they refused to control themselves and had three comments removed in fourteen days. The only stick the H-T has to discourage trolls now is banning, and that is done so rarely (even for the most egregious trolls) it has no real value in maintaining order.

Last week, a letter to the editor was published encouraging the Herald-Times to allow publication of anonymous letters to the editor. Allowing fake names for LTTE would be a huge step backward for civil and rational community dialogue, pushing the LTTE section towards the often nasty (and always rowdy) story comments.

If you want your opinion published in the newspaper, you should be willing to take responsibility for your words by attaching your real name to it. Allowing people to sign LTTE with fake names would not even address the problem that the author presents: His first and last name is identical to another person who has letters published on a regular basis, including one that was published three weeks earlier and within the same calendar month. If the other person continues to write letters to the editor, there will still be the opportunity for people to confuse the author of the September 24 letter with the author of the September 3 letter.

Name confusion is a legitimate point. Even in a small city like Bloomington (with about 81,000 people) there will be a number of people with the same name. If you have one of those old-fashioned telephone books lying around, take a look under the name "Smith" and see how many people share the same first and last name.

Perhaps the Herald-Times could do a better job differentiating between people with similar names, but the reality is that most people are not going to know the unique identifier attached to people who share a name. Most people do not follow LTTE closely enough to make that distinction.

The suggestion of having each writer be assigned a pseudonym, though, would be a radical and unprecedented departure from the way letters to the editor are handled by the newspaper industry.

Like it or not, sometimes community debate with real names is messy, but the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks.

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.

  5. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

Thank you for your cooperation.


At October 2, 2014 at 8:16 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

As in the past, I agree with you on this point. The "Name Withheld by Request" letters in the Brown County Democrat are edited for "civility," but still fling around anonymous charges including claims of criminal behavior that are actionable per se if proven false.