|Thursday, November 20, 2014|
Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)
As the Republican party takes over the Senate in the wake of the 2014 landslide, Republicans will be tempted to monkeywrench the Obama Administration by holding up the President's nominees for positions within his administration. The GOP needs to resist that temptation and allow Obama to nominate who he chooses, within reason. (Obviously Judicial Branch appointments are another matter entirely.)
The reason Republicans should allow Obama to have who he wants is that whoever Obama nominates is only going to be following Obama's orders. Whoever is the attorney general secretary of state and so forth turns out to be, that person for all intents and purposes is Obama. If we have a problem with the administration's policies, it is with the President himself, not the cabinet secretaries. We can change those policies by winning the next election.
The only time a nominee should be rejected is in the case of an obvious severe character flaw, incompetence or corruption. That is why the nominees should be examined and questioned. Those cases are going to be relatively rare, because the administration is going to be vetting its own nominees. (This is especially true in the age of the Internet, when problems with a nominee can spread like wildfire in hours.) No administration wants to be embarrassed by a nominee with an undiscovered scandal in his or her background.
There will be plenty of opportunities to oppose Obama and block his agenda in the next two years, but Obama's choices to fill his administration should not be used as such an opportunity. Being mature adults about this and working with the President can also be an opportunity to make things easier for the next Republican President, or at least provide a contrast when Democrats are blocking his choices to fill his administration.
Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.
- A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.
- This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.
- Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.
- You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.
- Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.
Thank you for your cooperation.
, Mike Newton said...
"Just approve Obama's nominees, Republicans"
Sometimes, I almost think you're waking up to reality about your crazy party. No doubt you're aware that Congressional Republicans met before Obama's inauguration and vowed to frustrate every move he made, no matter hos small or innocuous, even when he adopted their own proposals (thereby making them look like the racist morons they are). Enslaved by the Koch Brothers and the "Tea Party" Koch money created, hammered by a bizarre primary system where the loudest, most obnoxious fanatic commonly triumphs, you have no leaders capable of doing their jobs as elected officials. Voters who continue reelecting them and blathering on about "revolution" are the fools in this game. If the dunce cap fits...
, Scott Tibbs said...
Do you think if Hillary Clinton or John Edwards was elected in 2008 the reaction would have been different?
No, it would not. It's partisan, not racist.
Furthermore, the position I took here works for both parties. Just as a Democratic President should be able to fill his administration as he sees fit, so should the next Republican President.
(Again, absent obvious corruption or incompetence.)