E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Friday, January 9, 2015

Seeking justice over convictions in child death cases

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

If we are truly interested in justice, we need serious reform of our forensic "science" and a completely different orientation in how we investigate crimes - especially the deaths of children. Too many people are in prison because of bad "science" that is geared toward securing convictions instead of finding the truth. To that end, I strongly recommend this excellent documentary by PBS on criminal convictions in child death cases.

When a sudden unexpected tragedy happens, it is natural to look for someone to blame. When a baby or toddler who is assumed to be healthy dies, it is natural to suspect foul play. But sometimes, there is no one to blame. Sometimes, things just happen that are beyond anyone's control - it is just a tragedy.

When an infant in his care suddenly died, Ernie Lopez was convicted based on forensic "science" of raping, beating and ultimately murdering the baby. But further examination reveals that the baby had an underlying medical condition that could have easily explained the "injuries" that she allegedly sustained at his hands.

The problem, ultimately, is that the orientation was to finding fault and assuming that the "injuries" the baby sustained were the result of criminal activity. To that end, forensic "science" was used not to discover the cause of death, but to convict Lopez of a crime. It was a flawed and biased process from start to finish. It is very likely that a man's life has been ruined because of something that was completely out of his control.

The duty of the civil magistrate - including police and prosecutors - is not to secure convictions and is certainly not to defend and protect false convictions. The duty of the civil magistrate is to seek justice. Justice is sending the guilty to prison (or perhaps the electric chair) but it is also exoneration of the innocent. When prosecutors petulantly defend questionable convictions, they are betraying the justice system, their oath of office and their nation.

See previous articles:

♣ - Justice, not convictions, must always be the goal.

♣ - Strip away anti-justice immunity

♣ - Seek justice, not convictions (Part III)

♣ - Seek justice, not convictions (Part II)

♣ - Seek justice, not convictions (Part I)

♣ - Justice, not convictions, must always be the goal


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.

  5. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Comments:

At January 10, 2015 at 7:54 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

"When a sudden unexpected tragedy happens, it is natural to look for someone to blame."

And your rotten GOP leads the way with idiotic "personhood" laws, threatening women who suffer miscarriages with prison if they can't prove the loss of a fetus was "natural," presumably "an act of God." Lie down with extremists, and your reputation suffers accordingly.