E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Arnold and Jesse Friedman are innocent!

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Father and son Arnold and Jesse Friedman were convicted in an unbelievable sex abuse case in the late 1980's, in which they were accused of engaging in ritualistic Satanic sexual abuse during a national panic about the issue. It was unbelievable at the time because people were horrified that this could happen. It is unbelievable now because the case has fallen apart and has been shown to be a fraud.

But this fraud destroyed two men's lives, sending both to prison. Jesse Friedman is still fighting to clear his name, and is running into opposition from the prosecutors who wrongly sent him to prison. The determination to hide the evidence that the younger Friedman is seeking is a shameful abuse of power and should be rejected by the courts. If the courts will not step in, all relevant officials should fight to see these records released.

This case is but one example of a criminal justice system gone haywire, abandoning a true search for justice to cater to the hysteria of the day and putting all of us at risk of a government that continually abuses its power. The ritualistic sex abuse scandals of the 1980's were the modern-day version of the Salem witch trials and the worst abuses of the Spanish Inquisition - demonstrating that a secular government can be every bit as dangerous as wild-eyed religious fanatics. (Which we already knew, thanks to the tens of millions of dead bodies created by Communism.)

What this case shows is the need for serious criminal justice reform, staring with eliminating immunity that law enforcement (especially prosecutors) enjoy from civil and criminal liability for misbehavior. More transparency is needed as well. There is no reason to hide the records in a closed case, especially when the wrongfully convicted person has been exonerated. There should be criminal penalties (including prison time) for refusing to turn over records in cases such as the Friedman case. Such stubbornness is the opposite of justice.

After decades of the "tough on crime" hysteria, we are (thankfully) seeing some pushback and a bipartisan concern for civil liberties. But there are entrenched interests within the justice system that will fight ferociously to preserve their privileges. Only a bipartisan coalition can restrain the abuses of the criminal justice system by taking the politics out of it. Let's hope this happens sooner rather than later.

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.

  5. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

Thank you for your cooperation.


At February 18, 2015 at 6:49 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

"After decades of the "tough on crime" hysteria, we are (thankfully) seeing some pushback and a bipartisan concern for civil liberties."

"Some pushback,"indeed, but is it too little, too late? From what I see, cops and courts--especially, though not exclusively, in "red" states--get worse by the day. And, of course, you personally "enthusiastically support" executions, even in states with horrendous records for frame-ups and denial of civil liberties in their privatizes lockups.