E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Friday, February 13, 2015

Questions about civil asset forfeiture

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Thou shalt not steal. -- Exodus 20:15

Civil asset forfeiture has been a big issue the last couple weeks nationally, so it stands to reason (especially in an election year) that voters deserve to be informed about what is being done locally regarding this practice. With that backdrop, I sent the following list of questions to several government officials in Bloomington city government

  • Does the Bloomington Police Department seize money and property in the course of criminal investigations, specifically illegal drug investigations?
  • What restrictions are in place on these seizures, if any?
  • Are there civil asset forfeitures done by the BPD in cooperation with the federal government?
  • What additional protections are in place, locally, to safeguard civil liberties of people not convicted of a crime?
  • How much money and/or property is confiscated on an annual basis, if any?
  • Are detailed records maintained of money and/or property seized by the BPD, if any?

As has been documented by Radley Balko and the staff of Reason.com, there have been a number of cases where people have lost huge amounts of money and/or property due to "civil asset forfeiture" laws. Many of these people have not even been charged with a crime, much less actually convicted of one. Civil asset forfeiture has, to a large extent, become nothing more than a racket that law enforcement uses to fund itself. The motive is greed, not protecting the innocent or punishing the guilty.

The theory behind asset forfeiture was reasonable - that since profit is the motive for organized crime, the government can take that profit away to diminish the incentive to commit those crimes. The problem is that civil asset forfeiture has expanded far beyond the drug kingpins it was originally supposed to harm and has become a cash cow for law enforcement specifically and government generally. It is "legalized" theft.

So how much of this happens locally? I do not know. That is why I am asking these questions.

(0 Comments)

Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.

Comments:

Post a Comment


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.