E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Friday, February 6, 2015

The measles vaccine should be mandatory - no exceptions

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

As a philosophical libertarian, I believe you should be allowed to do what you please provided you are not harming anyone else. This means you cannot steal someone's property, assault them or kill them. You cannot recklessly damage someone's property or endanger someone's life. But as long as your choices only impact you, the government should pretty much leave you alone.

It is based on this principle that the measles vaccine (and other vaccines for deadly diseases) should be mandatory, with no exceptions. The paranoid anti-vaccine movement has relied on crackpot "science" to spread fear, so a bunch of entitled rich people have failed to protect themselves and their children from a deadly disease. They have exploited the incredibly weak system of exceptions to put public health at risk and it is time for the government to step in and put a stop to this. If necessary, people should be forcibly vaccinated as a public health measure.

Mandatory vaccination of children is tricky. Parents should have wide latitude in how they choose to raise their children, but parental rights are not unlimited. Child abuse is obviously a crime. Parents who fail to feed their children can lose their parental rights. Because children (especially infants and toddlers) cannot make rational medical care choices, their parents must provide the proper care. Therefore, not seeking medical care after a serious injury is grounds for neglect charges. Vaccines for potentially deadly diseases fall into that category.

In addition to protecting the rights (as well as the lives) of children from foolish parents, the civil magistrate also has a legitimate interest in protecting public health. People who refuse perfectly safe vaccines can spread deadly diseases through the population, and therefore violate the rights of other citizens. Because we interact with many others on a daily basis, the state has an interest in protecting their lives and health from the foolish choices of vaccine opponents.

I am generally not one to advocate for more government. But while I am a philosophical libertarian, I am not an anarchist. While mandatory vaccinations may seem like a radical proposal, it is a reasonable one.


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.

  5. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Comments:

At February 11, 2015 at 6:22 PM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

"But as long as your choices only impact you, the government should pretty much leave you alone."

Unless, of course, it's two gays getting married, in which case your conservative crowd claims it's a "threat to society," even though not one of the fools can explain how or why.