|Wednesday, April 29, 2015|
Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)
After sixteen years, it is time for the Bloomington City Council to end the annual farce of funding Bloomington's Planned Parenthood, which operates an abortion "clinic" on South College Avenue, just a few blocks south of the county courthouse. It is time for the councilors to show they are serious about the purpose of this fund.
When the councilors vote to distribute grants from the John Hopkins Social Services Fund in June, they will be giving away $270,000. That is far below the total amount requested, which is $472,004.38. This means the council will be forced to deny over $200,000 in requests be organizations that do not have the backing of a national organization with over one billion dollars in annual revenue.
Following is my letter to the City Council.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Please do not fund Planned Parenthood
From: Scott Tibbs <email@example.com>
Date: Sat, April 25, 2015 11:34 am
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Once again, I am asking you to reject Planned Parenthood's request for funding from the Jack Hopkins Social Services Fund. Since 1999, this body has approved $42,767.71 in requests by Planned Parenthood, including $2,440.00 in 2006 for cabinetry, files and furniture to renovate the front office.
The guidelines for agencies requesting Hopkins funding state that this should be for a one-time investment. The council reiterated that with the letter to agencies that may seek funding:
|Hopkins grants are intended to be a one-time investment. This restriction is meant to encourage innovative projects and to allow the funds to address changing community circumstances. While the Committee may provide operational funding for pilot, bridge efforts, and collaborative initiatives, an agency should not expect to receive or rely on the Hopkins fund for on-going costs (e.g., personnel) from year to year.|
Planned Parenthood long ago abandoned any pretense that they were seeking a one-time investment. For the last several years they have been seeking funding for operating expenses and ongoing costs.
This year is a city election year. Now is the time to end these political games and rededicate yourselves to the true mission of the social services fund, and give the money that would go to Planned Parenthood to a worthy and non-controversial organization - one that does not have the backing of a national organization that takes in over one billion dollars every year and runs a huge budget surplus in nine figures.
Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.
- A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.
- This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.
- Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.
- You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.
- Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.
Thank you for your cooperation.
, Mike Newton said...
"give the money that would go to Planned Parenthood to a worthy and non-controversial organization - one that does not have the backing of a national organization that takes in over one billion dollars every year and runs a huge budget surplus in nine figures."
Any rational argument against taxing the religion stores we call churches? The large ones sit on billions worth of cash, property, art, etc. None should ever have been tax-exempt in the first place.
, Scott Tibbs said...
Your comment has nothing to do with the content of the post. Do you have an objection to what I wrote?