E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Monday, July 20, 2015

The social media outrage machine

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

A friend of mine told me in a private message on Facebook a couple weeks ago that "social media is destroying this country." He has a point. While social media has been an opportunity for the average person to have a much larger voice in political and social issues than ever before, it also carries a lot of negatives. The biggest negative is what I like to call the "Social Media Outrage Machine."

Two stories illustrate this. First, a professor called for white people to commit mass suicide over slavery. While this is factually correct, it is also false. He was not actually calling for white people to kill themselves. He was being sarcastic. And as it turns out, Sir Tim Hunt was also being sarcastic in remarks made about why women are not qualified to be scientists. Unfortunately, we live in a nation where people live on a hair-trigger and are ready to be outraged at any moment, over something the least bit plausible. We also live in a nation where a lot of people are too dim-witted to get sarcasm. Social media allows that outrage to spread in a way that could not happen twenty years ago.

I admit, much to my shame, that I have also fallen for things like this far too many times.

So what is the answer? First of all, bookmark Snopes.com and be ready to use it. Snopes has been a great resource in refuting some of the silliness I see on social media. Second, when you see something trending, investigate it before you post about it on social media. This is especially important if what you see outrages or angers you. Do not just hit "share" or "retweet" because what you are sharing may not be true. It is also possible that it is factually correct but very misleading, like a sarcastic comment taken out of context.

We may not be able to put the genie back in the bottle, but we can avoid being part of the problem.

(4 Comments)

Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.

Comments:

At July 20, 2015 at 6:19 AM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

"The biggest negative is what I like to call the "Social Media Outrage Machine."

Anything like the Right Wing Lie Ma,chine dominated by Fox and your self-described "political hero," confessed drug smuggler Rush Limbaugh, or Acid Anne Coulter, whom you've admitted fabricates her "views" for money?


At July 20, 2015 at 6:36 AM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

If you think this is confined to one side you're deluding yourself. One example is the lies and fabrications about Memories Pizza "discriminating" against homosexuals.

Memories Pizza does not cater weddings at all, so they have obviously never discriminated in what weddings they choose to cater.

The attacks on Tim Hunt were from the Left, and the attacks on Adam Kotsko were from the Right. Both sides have plenty of perverts and reprobates, so give it a rest.

And Rush Limbaugh is not a drug smuggler. That's just laughable.


At July 20, 2015 at 6:21 PM , Blogger Mike Newton said...  

Nothing's "resting" here. No honest man would use the "both sides do it" excuse while pretending to stand either for truth or patriotism. It's a sure mark of hypocrisy, anathema to your alleged Lord and Savioor who publicly condemned all hypocrites. Your admission of "pervert" Republicans is likewise a weird and dishonst response, since neither your blog nor my answer mentioned any such thing. That said, since you admit cleaving to a party with "plenty of perverts," what does that make you?

Re. bloated professional liar (and your "political hero") Limbaugh, his April 2006 charges and narrow evasion of same are a matter of public record. He's your man, and you're stuck with him until such time as you publicly disavow him--in short, the 12th of Never. Add in Coulter and crazed racist Larry Pratt, and it seems you seek the very worst on gap to idolize. Thats on you, and you know it.


At July 20, 2015 at 7:56 PM , Blogger Scott Tibbs said...  

No honest man would use the "both sides do it" excuse

It's not an excuse. It's a fact.

Your admission of "pervert" Republicans is likewise a weird and dishonst response

No, it's recognizing reality. Both parties have their share of reprobates. That's a fact. There are thousands of elected offices and many millions of R and D voters.

In any large group, you're going to find perverts, reprobates and criminals. That doesn't mean the entire group is corrupt, especially in a two-party system in a nation of 300 million people. Look up the Fallacy of Composition.

To claim Limbaugh is a "drug smuggler," when prescription drugs were found in his possession, is silly and absurd. He's not running heroin or meth across the border.

This is from a CBS report on the 2006 incident:

Limbaugh's doctor had prescribed the Viagra, but it was "labeled as being issued to the physician rather than Mr. Limbaugh for privacy purposes," Roy Black, Limbaugh's attorney, said in a statement.

One more thing. Cool down. You've posted things in comments that are defamatory several times and you are consistently on the line in terms of civility.


Post a Comment


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.