E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Monday, September 14, 2015

Let's chill out on the "War on Cops" rhetoric

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

If there is a "war on cops," it is one of the most ineffective wars we have ever seen. As The Guardian points out, police officers are safer today in raw numbers than they have been in 25 years:

According to the Officer Down Memorial Page (ODMP), which keeps data on officer deaths going back over 100 years, 24 officers have been shot and killed by suspects this year. This puts the US on pace for 36 non-accidental, firearm-related police fatalities in 2015. Each one of such deaths is a tragedy for the officers killed, their families and the communities they serve, but this would be the lowest total in 25 years, aside from 2013 which saw 31 such deaths.

But those numbers look even better when you consider that there are many more cops on the street today than there were in 1990 and that the population is much bigger than it was then. Not only are police fatalities smaller in raw numbers today than 25 years ago, the fatality rate is down quite a bit too. According to the Justice Department, "There are more than 900,000 sworn law enforcement officers now serving in the United States." This means 36 police officers murdered in 2015 amounts to 0.004% of all police officers in the country.

Why point this out? First of all, truth is good unto itself. If you have a false narrative that a lot of people believe, it is good to dispel the myths and correct the record.

But there are public policy ramifications too. If we're misleading police officers - intentionally or not - they will be more nervous and more likely to use force if they feel threatened. This is especially true when many of the folks that police are dealing with are already unsavory individuals. This is not a criticism of police. It is an observation about human nature and the natural self-preservation instinct. Now matter how professional or well trained someone is, if that person has been fed false propaganda about how they are being targeted they will be extra careful.

Also, bad information leads to bad policy. Our policy makers need to know that there is no war on police, so they do not overreact with policies designed to fight against a war that is not actually happening. A crisis is a perfect opportunity for politicians to expand their power and restrict our liberty, so when there is actually not a crisis we need to point that out, loudly, clearly and (if necessary) repeatedly.

No one denies that one police officer killed in the line of duty is too many, just as any murder is one too many. But we must base our arguments (and especially our public policy) on reality, not on myths, paranoia and false memes.

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.