E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Thursday, November 5, 2015

All taxation is forced confiscation of wealth

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Let me defend, expand and explain this premise: All taxes are forced confiscation of wealth, backed up by armed agents of the state. This is a plain and simple reality. If you do not believe it, stop paying your property taxes. Eventually, the sheriff will kick you out of your property and that property will be sold in a tax sale. If you are self-employed and pay your own income taxes, stop paying them and the IRS will also come get you.

This does not mean I am an anarchist. Far from it. Civil government is a gift to us from God, for the protection of the righteous and the punishment of the wicked. We see this in Romans 13. For government to perform the functions needed for a civil society to exist - infrastructure, law enforcement, civil and criminal courts, fire protection and so forth - taxation is necessary. Therefore, taxation is a legitimate function of government and is part of the contract we have established as a society to maintain order.

So yes, I understand basic political theory. I have never said that I reject the premise. Not one single time. I understand the civil contract between the government and the citizens, among citizens themselves, and between units of government that have their own spheres of authority. I understand the theory that government operates by the consent of the governed. (How close that is to reality today is open for debate, and is not the point.) I do not believe and have never said that taxation itself is theft. Taxation can be theft in certain circumstances, but it is not automatically theft.

But we should not kid ourselves here: All taxes are mandatory. Most people do pay their taxes voluntarily and some are happy to pay them. But never forget that voluntary, peaceful compliance with forced confiscation of wealth does not mean it is not forced confiscation of wealth backed up by armed agents of the state. Even notorious gangster Al Capone went to prison for tax evasion.

Because we have formed a government to maintain a civil society and do the things collectively that individuals or private groups cannot or will not do, forced confiscation of wealth (taxation) itself is a necessary and morally neutral thing. But because of the immense power of the state, the power of the state must be measured and limited.

This is why buying a fire truck or building a road or a jail (for example) are legitimate uses of the authority to tax. It is wrong to force all citizens with strong religious and moral objections to the practice of abortion to donate to an abortion mill, even if those funds do not directly go to abortion services. This is not a legitimate or appropriate use of that state power, legal though it may be. And I would have said the same thing fifteen years ago if the city council was donating to the Boy Scouts over the objections of taxpayers unhappy with the group's policy on homosexual scout leaders.

(0 Comments)

Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.

Comments:

Post a Comment


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.