E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Saturday, February 13, 2016

Reform the presidential primary system

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Note: I wrote this eight years ago, and it is still relevant today.

This week's "instant message" question to Herald-Times readers is whether Indiana needs change the date of the primary election. This would give Hoosiers more of a voice in the nominating process, but ultimately is just another way to make the overall process more confusing and cumbersome. We are already having problems as states move primaries around to get more of a voice in picking the Republican and Democrat nominees for President.

What really needs to happen is a complete reform of the presidential nominating process. I believe there should be 6 primaries over 11 weeks, with the ten smallest states voting first, moving up until the largest states vote last. There would be two weeks between each "Super Tuesday". (While we're reforming the nomination process, we might as well change the day to Saturday, which would make it easier for many people to vote.) Basically, the primaries would be organized as follows, based on the population numbers as reported by Wikipedia:

  • Week 1: Wyoming, Vermont, North Dakota, Alaska, South Dakota, Delaware, Montana, Rhode Island, Hawaii and New Hampshire
  • Week 3: Maine, Idaho, Nebraska, West Virginia, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Kansas, Arkansas and Mississippi
  • Week 5: Iowa, Connecticut, Oklahoma, Oregon, Kentucky, Louisiana, South Carolina, Alabama, Colorado and Minnesota
  • Week 7: Wisconsin, Maryland, Missouri, Tennessee, Arizona, Indiana, Massachusetts, Washington, Virginia and New Jersey
  • Week 9: North Carolina, Georgia, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania
  • Week 11: Illinois, Florida, New York, Texas and California

One concern many people have about a national primary day is that it would give a heavy advantage to the candidate with the most money. Furthermore, the smallest states would likely be ignored as candidates make their push in the states with the most votes (and therefore the most delegates.) By spreading the nomination process out over 11 weeks and saving the most populated states until the end, voters would have the opportunity to compare the candidates over a longer period of time. The largest states would still ultimately decide the nomination.

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.