E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Thursday, March 17, 2016

A welcome step forward on transparency

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

The Monroe County Commissioners are terrible on transparency, and they could learn a lot from the Monroe County Republican Party. The MCGOP is actively working to improve transparency in county government though the limited positions Republicans hold. The commissioners (all three of whom are Democrats) stubbornly resist transparency.

On March 15, the Republican Party's appointee to the election board (and Monroe County Republican Party chairman) William Ellis moved that the county election board members have county government e-mail addresses to ensure that all e-mail correspondence on official business is stored on the county's e-mail server and subject to open records requests. That proposal was unanimously passed.

The reason this is significant, especially for the county commissioners, is that two of the three county commissioners openly use their private e-mail accounts for official business.

The other reason this is significant is that while Ellis earns a small stipend for his position, the county commissioners earn an annual salary of $32,921.00 for holding their position while the county commissioners' president earns an annual salary of $34,249.00. They are earning more than many full-time county employees make!

There are many workers in county government (and the private sector) who make significantly less money than Pat Stoffers and Julie Thomas, but have no issue with having separate work and personal e-mail addresses. For the many workers in county government who play by the rules and have their e-mail open to FOIA requests, what does it say to them that two of the three elected county administrators who make significantly more than they do are unwilling to play by the same rules? What do you think that does to employee morale?

When I ran for city council last year, I highlighted the need for more transparency in city government. And while the city has its problems, county government is much worse. Taxpayers deserve better than what we are getting from Pat Stoffers and Julie Thomas. Both of them should immediately stop using their personal email for official county government business and apologize for not following basic "best practices" in their employment with the county.

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.

  5. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

Thank you for your cooperation.