E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr
Google Plus
YouTube
Flickr
PhotoBucket
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

IDS opinion page makes students unsafe

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Why is the Indiana Daily Student subjecting students to possible harassment and stalking?

We hear a lot about students needing to "feel safe" on campus these days, and most of that is utter nonsense. "Students" who need a "safe space" because someone had the audacity to disagree with them on a political or social issue need to grow up and join the real world. But there is a potentially real threat to student safety from the IDS editorial page, and that is the sloppy editing of letters to the editor.

The IDS has a bad habit of printing e-mail addresses of letter writers, which is bad enough. But I was taken aback by the February 24 edition, which printed the cell phone number of a student who had written a letter. It was also online, but was removed after I sent a note to the editor-in-chief and the opinion editor saying that for the writer's "privacy and safety, I urge you to take it off the website."

I understand why a newspaper would want a letter writer's address and phone number for verification purposes, to ensure the writer is who he says he is. Normally, that information would never be published in the print or online edition.This allows the writer to have his say without exposing him to unnecessary attention. If someone has a listed phone number, a disgruntled reader can always call him up and curse him out, but it is an extra step. It should be obvious why someone's contact information should not be published with his letter.

I do not believe the Indiana Daily Student meant any harm, or even intended to publish the number. But the opinion editor and the copy editors need to be more careful about this sort of thing in the future, to protect students' safety. This is a mistake that should never be made. Furthermore, the IDS needs to abolish the practice of publishing letter authors' e-mail addresses. A paid columnist or writer should expect to see his e-mail published, as that is a common practice. A letter writer, however, does not and should not expect that.

(0 Comments)

Note: All posts must be approved by the blog owner before they are visible on the blog.

Comments:

Post a Comment


Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name cannot be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you have to subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

  5. All moderation decisions are final. I may post an explanation or I may not, depending on the situation. If you have a question or a concern about a moderation decision, e-mail me privately rather than posting in the comments.

Thank you for your cooperation.