E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

I said back in January that I would be re-watching and posting my thoughts on the first six Star Wars movies, after watching Episode VII. It's taken a long time for me to finally get around to re-watching Episode I, but I did finish it. I will not be pointing out the flaws, as everyone has already done that. I will instead be pointing to things I liked.

Right off the bat, Darth Maul is awesome. He looks like a demon and Ray Park is amazing at his fight scene. We have not seen martial arts in Lightsaber duels up until this point, and despite that it fits in seamlessly. A Sith Lord that can take on two Jedi at once is very menacing, and the Lightsaber staff was great. Killing the character was a huge mistake, and it could have been a great motivation for Anakin and Obi-Wan to chase him in the next movie to get revenge for killing Qui-Gon Jinn. Such a wasted opportunity.

Jake Lloyd's performance was by no means Oscar worthy but his acting was far from the only robotic performance. Samuel L. Jackson was very monotone, and Natalie Portman was very wooden at times too - especially when she is asking the Gungans for help. Lloyd did fine for what he was given, and honestly very few nine year olds (including the ones who criticize him most strongly) are going to do much better.

The CGI has not aged well and does look very fake at times. However, once you become invested in the film it does create a huge world that could not be built with practical effects. You can tell here what George Lucas wanted to do with the first three movies in terms of setting up this huge world.

It is especially noteworthy in how it shows the Jedi Council has become arrogant and complacent, allowing the rise of the Sith - including one serving in the Senate. Yoda especially comes off as a real jerk when he is berating a little boy for missing his mother. In many ways, the Jedi is responsible for its own downfall. That will become much more prominent in Episode III, when they are doing downright villainous things.

Yes, this movie has a lot of flaws, and I could go on at length about them. But, again, everyone else has already done that. If you can look past them, there is a lot of good here. This is the weakest film of the entire series, but it is still a Star Wars movie and in my opinion is very enjoyable.

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.

  5. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

Thank you for your cooperation.