E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Friday, November 18, 2016

In defense of Donald Trump's voters

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

I have made no secret of the fact that I opposed Donald Trump, and did not vote for the man. That said, there are many people of good conscience who did vote for Trump and are unfairly being smeared and maligned by Leftists bitter abut his victory. I understand the frustration but these smears need to stop.

Let's be real here. Trump's victory was not a victory for bigotry, xenophobia, racism and whatever other sins you want to pin on Trump's voters. Trump's victory was a rejection of Hillary Clinton, who got about five million fewer votes than Barack Obama did in 2012. Meanwhile, Trump got about the same number of votes that Mitt Romney did when he was the Republican nominee four years ago.

  • 2008 -- Barack Obama got 69,297,997 votes and John McCain got 59,597,520 votes.
  • 2012 -- Barack Obama got 65,446,032 votes and Mitt Romney got 60,589,084 votes.
  • 2016 -- Hillary Clinton got 60,467,601 votes and Donald Trump got 60,072,551 votes.

Obviously, Trump was a deeply flawed candidate and is a deeply flawed person. But this was not about bigotry. It was a status quo election. Republicans who voted for Romney and McCain also voted for Trump. Meanwhile, millions of Democrats who voted for Obama did not vote for Clinton. The 2016 election followed normal political patterns: It is rare for a party to win three Presidential elections in a row.

Crying wolf will not help matters. What the Democrats said in 2016 about Trump is virtually identical to what they said about Mitt Romney, John McCain, George W. Bush, Bob Dole, George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan. Eventually people start to tune it out. If Democrats believe that Trump is uniquely dangerous, they should regret damaging their ability to make that case by using such absurd hyperbole against Republican candidates for President (and Congress and all the way down to local government) for generations.

Because this was basically a status quo election, smearing Republicans who voted for Trump as people who "reached into their soul and found there, after all its conceits were stripped away, a grinning white supremacist" will not work. Instead, it will harden opposition to Democrats and motivate those people (who are not white supremacists) to continue to vote for Republicans. After all, why would sixty million people ever want to vote for a political party that thinks they are all a bunch of hate-mongers?

If you are going to be angry about the 2016 election, you should direct your anger to the appropriate place. Instead of being angry at Republicans, be angry that Democrats nominated a deeply flawed, thoroughly corrupt, uncharismatic liar who could not hold the Obama coalition together.

Below are the rules for commenting on ConservaTibbs.com.

  1. A reasonable level of civility is expected. While it is expected that controversial political and social issues may generate heated debate, there are common-sense limits of civility that will be enforced.

  2. This blog is a family-friendly site. Therefore no cursing, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, etc. will be allowed. This is a zero-tolerance rule and will result in automatic deletion of the offending post.

  3. Anonymity has greatly coarsened discourse on the Internet, so pseudonyms are discouraged but not forbidden. That said, any direct criticism of a person by name may not be done anonymously. If you criticize someone, you must subject yourself to the same level of scrutiny or the comment will be deleted.

  4. You must put a name or pseudonym on your comments. All comments by "Anonymous" will be deleted.

  5. Please keep your comments relevant to the topic of the post.

Thank you for your cooperation.