E-mail Scott
Scott's Links
About the Author
Opinion Archives
Social Media:
Google Plus
Monthly Archives:

January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
October 2012
November 2012
December 2012
January 2013
February 2013
March 2013
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013
July 2013
August 2013
September 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
January 2014
February 2014
March 2014
April 2014
May 2014
June 2014
July 2014
August 2014
September 2014
October 2014
November 2014
December 2014
January 2015
February 2015
March 2015
April 2015
May 2015
June 2015
July 2015
August 2015
September 2015
October 2015
November 2015
December 2015
January 2016
February 2016
March 2016
April 2016
May 2016
June 2016
July 2016
August 2016
September 2016
October 2016
November 2016
December 2016
January 2017
February 2017
March 2017
April 2017
May 2017
June 2017

Powered by Blogger
Subscribe via RSS

Saturday, December 31, 2016

Final post of 2016

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 11:39 PM (#)

George Lucas somehow managed to drain all charisma from Samuel L. Jackson in the "Star Wars" prequels. Liam Neeson complained that Lucas wanted wooden performances. Of course Jake Lloyd was going to be robotic in his scenes. He did fine with what he was given and considering who was calling the shots.

I am going to get around to finishing my Star Wars retrospective eventually by re-watching and covering Episode III. Here is Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4 of that series.

Friday, December 30, 2016

I have strange dreams.

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

I had a dream a few years ago that I was back in high school. Not unusual, right?

In this case, we were all the age we were in present day. I looked around at my classmates and said "Why are we here? We're all adults in our mid to late 30's and we have long since graduated. Let's get out of here."

Thursday, December 29, 2016

James 4:14

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away.

Sunday, December 25, 2016

Isaiah 9:6

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Friday, December 23, 2016


Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

My beard is going gray like the individual hairs are microwave popcorn. Pop pop, gray.

Pop pop pop pop pop. More gray.

Pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop pop.

Thursday, December 22, 2016

The drive-by media

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 10:00 AM (#)

Throwback Thursday: Mass shootings and the reckless "news" media.

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

1 Corinthians 1:27

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty

Monday, December 19, 2016

Hot Coffee

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Saturday, December 17, 2016

Off to get a Christmas tree!

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Friday, December 16, 2016

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

As a reminder, I have always opposed efforts to ban flag burning.

Monday, December 12, 2016

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

A quick note on flag burning:

  • The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning.

Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/4/8

Not only is flag burning not illegal, it is the preferred method of disposing of a flag in the U.S. Flag Code. What is being discussed in banning "flag burning" is not burning itself, but burning with specific intent or to send a specific message.

Thursday, December 8, 2016


Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

A telemarketer called me the other day. I was politely trying to ask to be taken off the list. She talked over me. Nobody hears the other when both people are talking, so I was forced to say "Shut up. Shut up." She shut her mouth and let me talk.

I was trying to be nice and polite. I really was. But sometimes you have to be nasty.

The fraudster who was bugging me earlier this year still calls occasionally. Usually they are TRIGGERED and hang up when I ask the name of the company. Once I actually got someone to stay on the line with me after I asked that question. He was TRIGGERED and hung up on me when I asked for the address of the company.

If you won't even answer these basic questions, then you are almost certainly a criminal trying to steal from me.

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Proverbs 25:28

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 5:30 PM (#)

He that hath no rule over his own spirit is like a city that is broken down, and without walls.

Monday, December 5, 2016

On Vacation

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

I am taking a very well-deserved vacation from politics for the rest of the month of December.

That said, I may still be blogging about non-political things this month.

Sunday, December 4, 2016

Blogger.com comments

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

I've decided to go back to Blogger's native comment system. All of the old comments are there, through June 2015. Unfortunately, all of the comments made on Disqus are gone.

Friday, December 2, 2016

Enough with the "all politicians are liars" meme

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

All politicians are liars. We hear it all the time. We need to stop believing it and we need to stop spreading this meme. It is cynical and lazy, and erodes trust in and respect for government in an unjustified way.

Let me start with a personal note. I have a lot of friends who have ran for and served in elective office and they are not liars. Most of those people have ran for office and served in local government, but I have friends who have served in the state legislature and even in Congress. Because it unfairly insults my friends, I get a little peeved at the "all politicians lie" meme.

One of the big problems with the meme is that it is cynicism for the sake of cynicism. If they are all liars, and they are all crooked, then why should we bother voting at all? Why should we bother paying attention to what government is doing? If we are going to have a healthy society, we need to have some level of trust in our institutions and the people who lead us.

Furthermore, it is intellectually lazy. People are people. Some people are honest and honorable. Some are dishonorable, some are corrupt, some are thieves and some are liars. By just assuming that they are all dirty, we do not have to do the hard work of discerning which ones are good and which ones are not. It takes all responsibility away from those who just throw everybody into the "liar" pile.

This is not how we should operate. If we want to have a good government that represents us well and protects our liberty, we cannot give in to cynicism and laziness. We need to sift through the good and bad. We even need to sift through the good for problems we may not see and the bad for benefits we may not see. In our system of government, our leaders will only be as good as the people we elect them, and we ultimately get what we deserve. We need to show we deserve better.

Thursday, December 1, 2016

Popular vote observations

Posted by Scott Tibbs at 4:00 AM (#)

Hillary Clinton won the popular vote over Donald Trump by a large margin, but Trump is still the President-Elect and will be sworn in as President in January. That has generated a lot of discussion, but here is the cold reality about the popular vote: It does not matter.

Candidates play the game by the rules in place. Neither candidate was were trying to win the popular vote. They were trying to win a combination of states to get them to 270 votes in the Electoral College. If the POTUS race was decided by the popular vote, both campaigns would have ran very differently. Trump, for example, did not have any reason to put a lot of resources into California and New York, the first and third largest states in the Union. He never had a chance of winning either state.

But there are a lot of Republicans in both of those states, who could have turned out to vote (and would have been targeted by Republican get-out-the-vote efforts) if the race was decided based on the popular vote. Democrats can complain about Clinton winning the popular vote while losing the election, but if the election was actually decided by the popular vote the campaign would have looked very different.

I am not saying she would not have won the popular vote under those circumstances, and I am not saying she would have won it. I am saying it would have been a very different campaign because the two candidates would have operated under different rules and a completely different system. Ultimately the popular vote is like a side quest in a role-playing game. It is nice, but is not needed to win.