Compromise or capitulation on gun laws?
So there is talk that we may see "compromise" on gun laws. Any further restriction on the right to own guns is not a compromise. It is a capitulation. We would be moving in the direction that the gun-grabbers want while we get absolutely nothing in return. How is that a compromise? Hint: It isn't a compromise! We need to rethink this entire notion of "compromise" if this is what we mean by it.
Create your profile
Only paid subscribers can comment on this post
Check your email
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.