Compromise or capitulation on gun laws?
So there is talk that we may see "compromise" on gun laws. Any further restriction on the right to own guns is not a compromise. It is a capitulation. We would be moving in the direction that the gun-grabbers want while we get absolutely nothing in return. How is that a compromise? Hint: It isn't a compromise! We need to rethink this entire notion of "compromise" if this is what we mean by it.