Conservative "unity" is a fraud and a hoax
The notion that conflict itself is bad is a Leftist proposition, and has no place in the conservative movement.
One of the things to come out of the Turning Point USA national conference the weekend before Christmas was people wringing their hands and obsessively worrying about "infighting" within the conservative movement. We're in a battle for the future of Western civilization, they say, and we cannot afford to be divided. The Left is not divided! We are letting them destroy us with our infighting! (Actually, there is plenty of infighting on the Left, but let's put that aside.)
This is the continuation of what used to be a Leftist proposition - that conflict itself is bad, no matter who is right and wrong. But the most important "movement" the world has ever seen was shaped by conflict, as we can see how the Apostle Paul engaged in conflict throughout his epistles (and against the Apostle Peter) to protect the purity and doctrine of the early Church. The Reformers engaged in conflict with the Roman Catholic Church over the purity of doctrine, and there have been plenty of conflicts within Protestantism over the last 500 years to protect the purity of the Church. If conflict benefits The Bride of Christ, then a political movement in these United States can deal with some divisions.
Truth matters, facts matter, and principles certainly matter. Are people being attacked deserving of those attacks? Are the attacks truthful? Are they in line with conservative principles? If so, then your problem should not be the one who is attacking others, but with the person being criticized if they are indeed straying from conservative principles or spreading libelous accusations or unhinged conspiracy theories. Instead of worrying about the fact that there is conflict, we should worry about "conservative" podcasters promoting Nazis like Nick Fuentes and degenerate pornographers like Andrew Tate, or spreading abominable smears about the wife of a murder victim.
I am all for having a reasonably big tent for the conservative movement. There are plenty of people who disagree in good faith on a wide variety of issues and are generally conservative, and there are plenty of disagreements by people of good faith on what strategies should be implemented to achieve conservative goals. However, there is a reason it is called a tent and not a wide open field. We need to have boundaries and standards. Some things - such as neo-Nazi ideology or promotion of degenerate pornography- should be outside of the tent. Ten years ago, none of this was debatable within mainstream conservatism and "no enemies to the right" would never apply to such things. We need to return to the time when principles and truth were more important than unity.