"No Enemies To The Right" is anti-logical
Stop clinging to "loyalty" to a group that will never reciprocate that loyalty. You are making a fool of yourself.
The people who loudly proclaim that they have “no enemies to the right” are political cucks: They are fiercely loyal to anyone who is on “the Right” (or are just simply anti-Left) while the alt-right constantly betrays that loyalty and attacks conservatives. They are the man who stands by his wife while she commits adultery, declaring his undying loyalty to a scam marriage. The alt-right does not respect cucked conservatives, and both moderates and Leftists disdain them for not opposing the neo-Nazis, white supremacists, woman haters and others in the alt-right.
The NETTR people love to point at the excesses of the Left in order to justify their stubborn loyalty to people who will never reciprocate that loyalty. “The Left is worse,” they claim. But no matter what extreme, clownish, godless or wicked thing you can point to on the Left, that does not justify or vindicate a man who dehumanizes the Vice President’s children, brags that women “want to be raped” and brutalized by their boyfriends or husbands, or publicly admires both Adolf Hitler (who he calls “really f*****g cool”) and Joseph Stalin. I do not know how you can square that circle, given the brutality of the war between Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Union. These are all things that homosexual Nazi Nick Fuentes has said.
Ted Bundy raped and murdered people, but Jeffrey Dahmer raped, murdered and ate people. Was Dahmer worse? It does not matter. Both men committed crimes worthy of death. It would be wicked and perverse to use Dahmer’s crimes as some sort of “defense” for Bundy’s crimes, or vice versa.
“Oh, but Fuentes touts America First!” Yes, and there are many others with the same non-interventionist views on foreign policy. There are many others who advocate for nationalism, without the depraved fawning over dictators and deranged, obsessive hatred of Jews. The “argument” that it is good to support a self-identified Nazi when there are plenty of others who are far more qualified is pure sophistry and should not be taken seriously.
We can agree that the Left’s agenda is bad. We do not want more regulations, more taxes, abortion on demand, support for sexual debauchery, attacks on free speech, or the denigration of our culture. That does not mean we should accept every “co-belligerent” against the Left. The racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, identity politics obsessed alt-right are not our allies and we should warn against their poisonous ideology. The fact that Leftists have expanded the definition of “racist” and “sexist” and “bigot” to absurd degrees does not mean those people do not actually exist or that we should be allied with people who explicitly reject the dignity of every man and woman made in God’s image.
The cause of the division over the alt-right is the alt-right itself. Remember, they called themselves “alt” (alternative) for a reason: They were and are opposed to traditional conservatives. They love the factionalism and division, and they are constantly attacking conservatives. In fact, the alt-right focuses more far more fire on the Right than they ever do against the Left. Many of them explicitly reject conservatism itself, claiming to be “patriots” or “nationalists.” I would personally love to be done with all of this infighting on the Right, but the saboteurs in the alt-right are just as much of an enemy as the Left and I refuse to be swayed by the weakness, dishonesty and hypocrisy that declares NETTR to be mandatory.