ConservaTibbs

Share this post
No need for an "anti-lynching" law
www.conservatibbs.com

No need for an "anti-lynching" law

Scott Tibbs
Mar 24, 2020
Comment
Share

Printed in the Herald-Times, March 24, 2020

To the Editor:

When James Byrd was brutally murdered, the state of Texas did not have a "hate crime" law, yet two of the three men who committed this demonic act were put to death and the third will spend life in prison. There was no need to make murder illegal a second time.

Similarly, there is no need for a federal law against lynching. Part of the problem with mass incarceration is the expanded federalization of law enforcement. Much of the problem with police militarization is that the federal government gives surplus military equipment to local police forces – something that violates the spirit if not the letter of the Posse Comitatus Act. The federal anti-lynching law proves we have not learned this lesson.

No one supports lynching, including the four brave Republicans who voted against this law. I wish our Congressman, Trey Hollingsworth, had joined them.

If the states were not protecting blacks from lynching, then the federal government would need to step in. That is not the case. Murder is illegal and prosecuted in all fifty states. Murderers should be put to death, as commanded in Genesis 9:6. But we do not need a bigger federal government to obey that command.

Comment on Facebook.

CommentComment
ShareShare

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 Scott Tibbs
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing